ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2020
A calibration disk for the correction of radial errors from chromatic aberration and rotor stretch in the Optima AUC™ analytical ultracentrifuge.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative biophysical characterization of molecular interactions: A case study with the sfGFP-nanobody complex.Analytical biochemistry · 2025Article
- Development of an advanced multiwavelength emission detector for the analytical ultracentrifuge.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Methods for the Design and Analysis of Analytical Ultracentrifugation Experiments.Current protocols · 2024Article
- Suitability of double-stranded DNA as a molecular standard for the validation of analytical ultracentrifugation instruments.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- A new UltraScan module for the characterization and quantification of analytical buoyant density equilibrium experiments to determine AAV capsid loading.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- Multi-wavelength analytical ultracentrifugation of biopolymer mixtures and interactions.Analytical biochemistry · 2022Review
- Calibrating analytical ultracentrifuges.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2021Article
- Analytical ultracentrifugation: still the gold standard that offers multiple solutions.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2020Article
- Measuring compressibility in the optima AUC™ analytical ultracentrifuge.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2020Article
- Moving analytical ultracentrifugation software to a good manufacturing practices (GMP) environment.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experiments performed in the analytical ultracentrifuge (AUC) measure sedimentation and diffusion coefficients, as well as the partial concentration of colloidal mixtures of molecules in the solution phase. From this information, their abundance, size, molar mass, density and anisotropy can be determined. The accuracy with which these parameters can be determined depends in part on the accuracy of the radial position recordings and the boundary conditions used in the modeling of the AUC data. The AUC instrument can spin samples at speeds up to 60,000 rpm, generating forces approaching 300,000 g. Forces of this magnitude will stretch the titanium rotors used in the instrument, shifting the boundary conditions required to solve the flow equations used in the modeling of the AUC data. A second source of error is caused by the chromatic aberration resulting from imperfections in the UV-visible absorption optics. Both errors are larger than the optical resolution of currently available instrumentation. Here, we report software routines that correct these errors, aided by a new calibration disk which can be used in place of the counterbalance to provide a calibration reference for each experiment to verify proper operation of the AUC instrument. We describe laboratory methods and software routines in UltraScan that incorporate calibrations and corrections for the rotor stretch and chromatic aberration in order to support Good Manufacturing Practices for AUC data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32388675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.