Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32388650›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial.

Zoltán Ruszkai, Erika Kiss, Ildikó László, Gergely Péter Bokrétás, Dóra Vizserálek, Ildikó Vámossy, Erika Surány, István Buzogány, Zoltán Bajory, Zsolt Molnár

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02931409 nacompletednot on this map

Intraoperative PEEP Optimization: Effects on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Inflammatory Response. A Double-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPéterfy Sándor HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsPulmonary Complications, Inflammatory ResponseArmsOptimal PEEP, Standard PEEP
NCT05508997 nacompletednot on this map

Response of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration for Mechanically Ventilated Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeidy F. AhmedRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsObesity Associated DisorderArmsrespiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)
NCT07349719 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Dynamic Compliance-guided Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Lumbar Stabilization Surgery:A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2026 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsLumbar Spine Stenosis, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Postoperative ComplicationsArmsDynamic Compliance Guided Ventilation, Standard Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. What is new in respiratory monitoring?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zoltán RuszkaiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Pest Megyei Flór Ferenc Hospital, Semmelweis Square 1, Kistarcsa, 2143, Hungary. z.ruszkai.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2469-7936
Erika KissDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Szeged, Semmelweis Street 6, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Ildikó LászlóDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Szeged, Semmelweis Street 6, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Gergely Péter BokrétásDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Péterfy Sándor Street 8-20, Budapest, 1076, Hungary.
Dóra VizserálekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Péterfy Sándor Street 8-20, Budapest, 1076, Hungary.
Ildikó VámossyDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Péterfy Sándor Street 8-20, Budapest, 1076, Hungary.
Erika SurányDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Péterfy Sándor Street 8-20, Budapest, 1076, Hungary.
István BuzogányDepartment of Urology, Péterfy Sándor Hospital, Péterfy Sándor Street 8-20, Budapest, 1076, Hungary.
Zoltán BajoryDepartment of Urology, University of Szeged, Kálvária Avenue 57, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Szigeti Street 12, Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
Péterfy Sándor Utcai Kórház-Rendelőintézet és Baleseti Központ · HUUniversity of Szeged · HUJahn Ferenc Dél-Pesti Kórház és Rendelőintézet · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8-14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory MechanicsHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaInflammatory responseLung protective ventilationPositive end-expiratory pressureProcalcitoninRespiratory mechanics

Identifiers

PMID32388650
PMCPMC7222900
OpenAlexW3022725374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.