Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32388647›Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Suprascapular nerve block in hemiplegic shoulder pain: comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, local anesthetic, and corticosteroid injections-a randomized controlled study.

Rana Terlemez, Selda Çiftçi, Mahir Topaloglu, Beril Dogu, Figen Yilmaz, Banu Kuran

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rana TerlemezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saglik Bilimleri University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. ranakaynar@hotmail.com.
Selda ÇiftçiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saglik Bilimleri University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mahir TopalogluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mahir Topaloglu; MD. Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Beril DoguDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saglik Bilimleri University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Figen YilmazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saglik Bilimleri University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Banu KuranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saglik Bilimleri University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShoulder pain is a common complication of hemiplegic patients that can interrupt their rehabilitation program and is associated with poorer outcomes. The usefulness of the suprascapular nerve block. (SSNB) in the stroke population has been suggested, but some concerns still remain.

objectivesTo investigate the effect of SSNB on pain intensity and passive range ofmotion (PROM) in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP). STUDY

designA prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial was conductedin 34 stroke patients with HSP. They were randomly divided into three groups: Localanesthetic (LA) injection into the trapezius muscle (placebo group), LA injection into thesuprascapular notch, and LA and corticosteroid (CS) injections into the suprascapularnotch.The main outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated before andafter administration of the injection at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month.

resultsThere were significant decreases in the VAS scores with all three injections at all follow-up time points (p: 0.001 for the placebo group, p <0.001 for the LA group, and p <0.001 for the LA+CS group). When changes in VAS scores were compared between the groups, the LA+CS group demonstrated a higher decrease in VAS than the placebo group. Improvement in the PROM was seen only in the LA and LA+CS groups.

conclusionsThe findings of this study support the use of an SSNB with or without CS, to increase the range of motion in the affected shoulder, especially during the rehabilitation period.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalNerve BlockAdrenal Cortex HormonesHemiplegiaHumansPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder PainTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnesthetics, Localhemiplegic shoulder painsuprascapular nerve block

Identifiers

PMID32388647
OpenAlexW3022372897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.