Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32388220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2020

Impact of clinically acquired miltefosine resistance by Leishmania infantum on mouse and sand fly infection.

Lieselotte Van Bockstal, Dimitri Bulté, Sarah Hendrickx, Jovana Sadlova, Petr Volf, Louis Maes, Guy Caljon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Therapeutic success and failure in using miltefosine to treat dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lieselotte Van BockstalLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Dimitri BultéLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sarah HendrickxLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Jovana SadlovaDepartment of Parasitology, Charles University, Vinicna 7, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Petr VolfDepartment of Parasitology, Charles University, Vinicna 7, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Louis MaesLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Guy CaljonLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: guy.caljon@uantwerpen.be.
University of Antwerp · BECharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the implications of clinically acquired miltefosine resistance (MIL-R) by assessing virulence in mice and sand flies to reveal the potential of MIL-R strains to circulate.

methodsExperimental infections with the MIL-R clinical Leishmania infantum isolate MHOM/FR/2005/LEM5159, having a defect in the LiROS3 subunit of the MIL-transporter, and its syngeneic experimentally reconstituted MIL-S counterpart (LEM5159

resultsThe fitness of the MIL-R strain differed between the mouse and sand fly infection model. In mice, a clear fitness loss was observed compared to the LiROS3-reconstituted susceptible strain. This defect could be rescued by episomal reconstitution with a wildtype LiROS3 copy. However, this fitness loss was not apparent in the sand fly vector, resulting in metacyclogenesis and efficient colonization of the stomodeal valve. Resistance was stable after passage in both sand fly and mouse.

conclusionThe natural MIL-R strain is significantly hampered in its ability to multiply and cause a typical visceral infection pattern in BALB/c mice. However, this LiROS3-deficient strain efficiently produced mature infections and metacyclic promastigotes in the sand fly vector highlighting the transmission potential of this particular MIL-R clinical Leishmania strain.

Indexed as

Leishmania infantumAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsDrug ResistanceGenes, ProtozoanInsect VectorsLeishmaniasis, VisceralMembrane Transport ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPhlebotomusPhosphorylcholinePsychodidaeAntiprotozoal AgentsMembrane Transport ProteinsmiltefosinePhosphorylcholineBioluminescent imagingFitnessLeishmania infantumLutzomyia longipalpisMiltefosine-resistancePhlebotomus perniciosusVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID32388220
PMCPMC7215113
OpenAlexW3021086283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.