Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32388157›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2020

A new approach to integrating patient-generated data with expert knowledge for personalized goal setting: A pilot study.

Marissa Burgermaster, Jung H Son, Patricia G Davidson, Arlene M Smaldone, Gilad Kuperman, Daniel J Feller, Katherine Gardner Burt, Matthew E Levine, David J Albers, Chunhua Weng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health Recommender Systems Development, Usage, and Evaluation from 2010 to 2022: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marissa BurgermasterNutritional Sciences & Population Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: marissa.burgermaster@austin.utexas.edu.
Jung H SonBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Patricia G DavidsonNutrition, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, USA.
Arlene M SmaldoneSchool of Nursing & College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Gilad KupermanBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel J FellerBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine Gardner BurtHealth Sciences, Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA.
Matthew E LevineBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
David J AlbersBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Pediatrics & Informatics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Chunhua WengBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Lena MamykinaBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-monitoring technologies produce patient-generated data that could be leveraged to personalize nutritional goal setting to improve population health; however, most computational approaches are limited when applied to individual-level personalization with sparse and irregular self-monitoring data. We applied informatics methods from expert suggestion systems to a challenging clinical problem: generating personalized nutrition goals from patient-generated diet and blood glucose data. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe applied qualitative process coding and decision tree modeling to understand how registered dietitians translate patient-generated data into recommendations for dietary self-management of diabetes (i.e., knowledge model). We encoded this process in a set of functions that take diet and blood glucose data as an input and output diet recommendations (i.e., inference engine). Dietitians assessed face validity. Using four patient datasets, we compared our inference engine's output to clinical narratives and gold standards developed by expert clinicians.

resultsTo dietitians, the knowledge model represented how recommendations from patient data are made. Inference engine recommendations were 63 % consistent with the gold standard (range = 42 %-75 %) and 74 % consistent with narrative clinical observations (range = 63 %-83 %). DISCUSSION: Qualitative modeling and automating how dietitians reason over patient data resulted in a knowledge model representing clinical knowledge. However, our knowledge model was less consistent with gold standard than narrative clinical recommendations, raising questions about how best to evaluate approaches that integrate patient-generated data with expert knowledge.

conclusionNew informatics approaches that integrate data-driven methods with expert decision making for personalized goal setting, such as the knowledge base and inference engine presented here, demonstrate the potential to extend the reach of patient-generated data by synthesizing it with clinical knowledge. However, important questions remain about the strengths and weaknesses of computer algorithms developed to discern signal from patient-generated data compared to human experts.

Indexed as

DietNutritional StatusSelf-ManagementAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusExpert SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNutritionistsPatient Care TeamPilot ProjectsBlood GlucoseExpert systemKnowledge representationPatient-generated health dataPersonalized nutritionSuggestion system

Identifiers

PMID32388157
PMCPMC7332366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.