Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32388005›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2020

New complexities of SOS-induced "untargeted" mutagenesis in Escherichia coli as revealed by mutation accumulation and whole-genome sequencing.

Brittany A Niccum, Christopher P Coplen, Heewook Lee, Wazim Mohammed Ismail, Haixu Tang, Patricia L Foster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pyocyanin produced byAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Extended sequence context shapes mutational bias inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection of mutations: from Ames test to duplex sequencing.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The expression regulation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany A NiccumDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Christopher P CoplenDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Heewook LeeLuddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Wazim Mohammed IsmailLuddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Haixu TangLuddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Patricia L FosterDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. Electronic address: plfoster@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007757 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 1985 to 2014
$8.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When its DNA is damaged, Escherichia coli induces the SOS response, which consists of about 40 genes that encode activities to repair or tolerate the damage. Certain alleles of the major SOS-control genes, recA and lexA, cause constitutive expression of the response, resulting in an increase in spontaneous mutations. These mutations, historically called "untargeted", have been the subject of many previous studies. Here we re-examine SOS-induced mutagenesis using mutation accumulation followed by whole-genome sequencing (MA/WGS), which allows a detailed picture of the types of mutations induced as well as their sequence-specificity. Our results confirm previous findings that SOS expression specifically induces transversion base-pair substitutions, with rates averaging about 60-fold above wild-type levels. Surprisingly, the rates of G:C to C:G transversions, normally an extremely rare mutation, were induced an average of 160-fold above wild-type levels. The SOS-induced transversion showed strong sequence specificity, the most extreme of which was the G:C to C:G transversions, 60% of which occurred at the middle base of 5'GGC3'+5'GCC3' sites, although these sites represent only 8% of the G:C base pairs in the genome. SOS-induced transversions were also DNA strand-biased, occurring, on average, 2- to 4- times more often when the purine was on the leading-strand template and the pyrimidine on the lagging-strand template than in the opposite orientation. However, the strand bias was also sequence specific, and even of reverse orientation at some sites. By eliminating constraints on the mutations that can be recovered, the MA/WGS protocol revealed new complexities of SOS "untargeted" mutations.

Indexed as

MutagenesisMutationSOS Response, GeneticsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEscherichia coliMutation RateWhole Genome SequencingDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA polymerase fidelityError-prone DNA polymerasesMutation accumulationMutation hotspotsSOS mutagenesisSOS response

Identifiers

PMID32388005
PMCPMC7299831
OpenAlexW3016953278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.