ReviewCognition2020
Individual differences in value-directed remembering.
Review in Cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Midbrain-Hippocampus Structural Connectivity Selectively Predicts Motivated Memory Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Trial
- Memory accessibility as a cue for perceived importance.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Prior novelty invigorates future mesolimbic target detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Identification of Reliable Target Brain Regions for Enhancing Object-Location Memory by Brain Stimulation.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Memory selectivity in younger and older adults: The role of conative factors in value-directed remembering.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Serial and strategic memory processes in younger and older adults.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025Article
- Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Mind-wandering when studying valuable information: The roles of age, dispositional traits, and contextual factors.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Memory selectivity in older age.Current opinion in psychology · 2024Review
- Alpha and theta oscillations on a visual strategic processing task in age-related hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.Memory & cognition · 2023Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Believing and Memory Functions.Europe's journal of psychology · 2023Article
- Value restructures the organization of free recall.Cognition · 2023Article
- Framing effects in value-directed remembering.Memory & cognition · 2022Article
- Value-directed memory effects on item and context memory.Memory & cognition · 2021Article
- Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.Experimental aging researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capacity limits in cognition require that valuable information be prioritized for encoding and retrieval. Individual differences in prioritized value-directed encoding may derive from differences in the general ability to encode memories, or from differences in how strategies are altered for different stimuli to modulate maintenance in working memory. We collected multiple cognitive ability measures to test whether variation in episodic memory, working memory capacity, or both predict differences in value-directed remembering among a large sample of participants (n = 205). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling was used to assess the contributions of episodic and working memory to value sensitivity in value-directed remembering tasks. Episodic memory ability, but not working memory capacity, was predictive of value-directed remembering. These results suggest that the ability to prioritize memory derives principally from episodic memory ability overall, so that greater capacity also permits greater flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.