ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2020
A novel comprehensive efficacy test for textiles intended for use in the healthcare setting.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation, identification, and metabolic phenotyping ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Manipulation and treatment of textiles and their relationship with healthcare-associated infections: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Finishing of Cotton Fabric with Curcumin Derivatives Coatings Obtained by Sol-Gel Method.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft surfaces, including textiles are found throughout healthcare settings. Pathogens can survive for long periods of time on textiles, and can be transferred to and from the skin. Antimicrobial fabrics are used as an engineering control to prevent infection. Efficacy testing standards have limitations, including single microorganism challenges, multiple fabric plies tested, and lengthy contact times. We developed a novel method that better models in-use conditions through testing standardized mixtures of pathogens and normal skin microorganisms, artificial soils, and a 15-min contact time. Reproducible growth of all microorganisms from frozen stocks was achieved using this method. A novel rechargeable, monitorable N-halamine cotton cellulose fabric, containing 5885 ± 98 ppm of active chlorine, was evaluated with the new method using PBS, artificial sweat, and artificial sweat plus 5% serum as soil. Pathogens tested included Acinetobacter baumannii, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each was tested singly and in the presence of a representative normal skin flora mixture, including: Acinetobacter lwoffii, Corynebacterium striatum, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. When tested singly, all microorganisms were reduced by 3.00 log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.