Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32387101›Full record

ReviewProgress in cardiovascular diseases

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis and treatment: An updated review of the evidence.

Marco Giuseppe Del Buono, Giulia Iannaccone, Roberto Scacciavillani, Salvatore Carbone, Massimiliano Camilli, Giampaolo Niccoli, Barry A Borlaug, Carl J Lavie, Ross Arena, Filippo Crea and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Mechanism of heart failure after myocardial infarction.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco Giuseppe Del BuonoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Giulia IannacconeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Roberto ScacciavillaniDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore CarboneDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, College of Humanities & Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Massimiliano CamilliDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Giampaolo NiccoliDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Barry A BorlaugDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carl J LavieDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ross ArenaDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Filippo CreaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio AbbateVirginia Commonwealth University, Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: antonio.abbate@vcuhealth.org.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITVirginia Commonwealth University · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several decades, clinicians and clinical scientists have had growing interest in heart failure (HF) diagnosis and treatment. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) is a well-known clinical entity with several therapeutic strategies proven to be successful, HF with preserved ejection fraction is a more heterogenous syndrome with a prevalence that has increased in the last two decades, without effective therapeutic strategies. Great strides have been made in the detection of predisposing risk factors and pathological mechanisms; however, pharmacological therapies have shown to be ineffective in reducing cardiovascular mortality in the HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) population, opening the way to the necessity of developing new precision medicine based approaches. On the other hand, novel therapies and device interventions still require refinements with the ultimate goal of offering new clinically treatments for the HFpEF population. The aim of the present review is to provide insights into the HFpEF pathophysiology, diagnostic pathways and the latest updates on treatment strategies and their potential future application in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorCardiovascular AgentsFunctional StatusHeart Disease Risk FactorsHeart FailureHumansPredictive Value of TestsRecovery of FunctionStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftCardiovascular AgentsDiagnosisHeart failureHFpEFPharmacologicalTherapeuticsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32387101
OpenAlexW3022181964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.