Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32386812›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2020

Comparative evaluation of DNA-encoded chemical selections performed using DNA in single-stranded or double-stranded format.

Gabriele Bassi, Nicholas Favalli, Sebastian Oehler, Adriano Martinelli, Marco Catalano, Jörg Scheuermann, Dario Neri

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriele BassiDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicholas FavalliDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sebastian OehlerDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Adriano MartinelliDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Marco CatalanoDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jörg ScheuermannDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: joerg.scheuermann@pharma.ethz.ch.
Dario NeriDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: dario.neri@pharma.ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

European Research Council 670603Swiss National Science Foundation 182003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DEL) are increasingly being used for the discovery and optimization of small organic ligands to proteins of biological or pharmaceutical interest. The DNA fragments, that serve as amplifiable identification barcodes for individual compounds in the library, are typically used in double-stranded DNA format. To the best of our knowledge, a direct comparison of DEL selections featuring DNA in either single- or double-stranded DNA format has not yet been reported. In this article, we describe a comparative evaluation of selections with two DEL libraries (named GB-DEL and NF-DEL), based on different chemical designs and produced in both single- and double-stranded DNA format. The libraries were selected in identical conditions against multiple protein targets, revealing comparable and reproducible fingerprints for both types of DNA formats. Surprisingly, selections performed with single-stranded DNA barcodes exhibited improved enrichment factors compared to double-stranded DNA. Using high-affinity ligands to carbonic anhydrase IX as benchmarks for selection performance, we observed an improved selectivity for the NF-DEL library (on average 2-fold higher enrichment factors) in favor of single-stranded DNA. The enrichment factors were even higher for the GB-DEL selections (approximately 5-fold), compared to the same library in double-stranded DNA format. Collectively, these results indicate that DEL libraries can conveniently be synthesized and screened in both single- and double-stranded DNA format, but single-stranded DNA barcodes typically yield enhanced enrichment factors.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesDNADNA, Single-StrandedLigandsModels, MolecularSmall Molecule LibrariesDNADNA, Single-StrandedLigandsSmall Molecule LibrariesDNA-encoded chemical librariesHigh throughput sequencingProtein selections

Identifiers

PMID32386812
PMCPMC7116422
OpenAlexW3021499660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.