Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2020
Raltegravir versus efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV (NICHD P1081): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial.
Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01618305 (A Phase IV Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Virologic Response and Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Potent Regimens in HIV Infected Women Initiating Triple Antiretroviral Regimens Between 20 and 36 Weeks of Pregnancy for the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IV Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Virologic Response and Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Potent Regimens in HIV Infected Women Initiating Triple Antiretroviral Regimens Between 20 and 36 Weeks of Pregnancy for the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission: NICHD P1081
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of neonatal sepsis among HIV exposed neonates of mothers on integrase strand transfer inhibitors in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of raltegravir in achieving virological suppression at delivery in HIV-positive pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of safety and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy regimens among pregnant women living with HIV at preconception or during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with classes of antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of DRG/3TC for Prophylaxis of HIV Perinatal Transmission: A Pilot Study (PREGNANCY).Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Brief Report: Vaginal Viral Shedding With Undetectable Plasma HIV Viral Load in Pregnant Women Receiving 2 Different Antiretroviral Regimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Perinatal outcomes associated with antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV: an umbrella review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Beyond HAART: unveiling the reality of antiretroviral therapy knowledge among pregnant women living with HIV in Kaduna State, Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in the Management of Pregnant People Living with HIV-1: A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Review
- Care of Pregnant Women Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Clinics in perinatology · 2024Review
- The End Is in Sight: Current Strategies for the Elimination of HIV Vertical Transmission.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2023Review
- Cesarean delivery and risk of HIV vertical transmission in Southern Brazil, 2008-2018.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Antiretroviral Options and Treatment Decisions During Pregnancy.Paediatric drugs · 2023Review
- Real-world experience with weight gain among pregnant women living with HIV who are using integrase inhibitors.HIV medicine · 2023Article
- Antiretroviral Therapy and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in People Living with HIV.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Review
- Congenital malformations and preeclampsia associated with integrase inhibitor use in pregnancy: A single-center analysis.PloS one · 2023Article
- Second-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrase Inhibitors Induce Differentiation Dysregulation and Exert Toxic Effects in Human Embryonic Stem Cell and Mouse Models.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Patterns of pregnancy loss among women living with and without HIV in Brazil, 2008-2018.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors at 16 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy.
methodsAn open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305.
findingsFrom Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths.
interpretationOur findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV.
fundingEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.