Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32386564›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2020

Access to lifesaving medical resources for African countries: COVID-19 testing and response, ethics, and politics.

Matthew M Kavanagh, Ngozi A Erondu, Oyewale Tomori, Victor J Dzau, Emelda A Okiro, Allan Maleche, Ifeyinwa C Aniebo, Umunya Rugege, Charles B Holmes, Lawrence O Gostin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant and postpartum Kenyan women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew M KavanaghDepartment of International Health, Washington DC, USA; O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington DC, USA. Electronic address: matthew.kavanagh@georgetown.edu.
Ngozi A EronduCentre for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, UK.
Oyewale TomoriRedeemer's University, Ede, Nigeria.
Victor J DzauUS National Academy of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Emelda A OkiroKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Narobi, Kenya.
Allan MalecheKenya Legal and Ethical Issues Network on HIV and AIDS, Narobi, Kenya.
Ifeyinwa C AnieboHealth Strategy and Delivery Foundation, Abuja, Nigeria; TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Umunya RugegeSection 27, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Charles B HolmesSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
Lawrence O GostinO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201866/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AfricaBetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHuman RightsHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPoliticsReagent Kits, DiagnosticSARS-CoV-2Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID32386564
PMCPMC7252104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.