Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32386343›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2020

One-year safety, healing and amputation rates of Wagner 3-4 diabetic foot ulcers treated with cryopreserved umbilical cord (TTAX01).

William A Marston, John C Lantis, Stephanie C Wu, Aksone Nouvong, John Randolph Clements, Tommy D Lee, Nicholas D McCoy, Herbert B Slade, Scheffer C Tseng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One-year safety, healing and amputation rates of Wagner 3-4 diabetic foot ulcers treated with cryopreserved umbilical cord (TTAX01).Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

William A MarstonDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
John C LantisMt Sinai West and St Luke's Hospitals, New York, New York, USA.
Stephanie C WuRosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Aksone NouvongDepartment of Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9904-6065
John Randolph ClementsCarilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Tommy D LeeTissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Nicholas D McCoyTissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Herbert B SladeTissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-8757
Scheffer C TsengTissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Ocular Surface Center · USCarilion Clinic · USRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science · USSt. Luke's Hospital · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An open label, multicenter 16-week trial of cryopreserved human umbilical cord (TTAX01) was previously undertaken in 32 subjects presenting with a Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcer, with 16 (50%) of these having confirmed closure following a median of one product application (previous study). All but two subjects (30/32; 94%) consented to participate in this follow-up study to 1-year postexposure. No restrictions were placed on treatments for open wounds. At 8-week intervals, subjects were evaluated for adverse events (AEs) and wound status (open or closed). Average time from initial exposure to end of follow-up was 378 days (range 343-433), with 29 of 30 (97%) subjects completing a full year. AEs were all typical for the population under study, and none were attributed to prior exposure to TTAX01. One previously healed wound re-opened, one previously unconfirmed closed wound remained healed, and nine new wound closures occurred, giving 25 of 29 (86.2%) healed in the ITT population. Three of the new closures followed the use of various tissue-based products. Three subjects whose wounds were healed required subsequent minor amputations due to osteomyelitis, one of which progressed to a major amputation (1/29; 3.4%). One additional subject underwent two minor amputations prior to healing. Overall, the study found TTAX01 to be safe in long-term follow-up and associated with both a low rate of major amputation and a higher than expected rates of healing.

Indexed as

CryopreservationWound HealingAdultAgedAmputation, SurgicalBiological ProductsDiabetic FootFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeUmbilical CordBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID32386343
PMCPMC7383512
OpenAlexW3022884770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.