Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32386281›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2020

High-throughput 3D bioprinting of corneal stromal equivalents.

Shallu Kutlehria, Thanh Cong Dinh, Arvind Bagde, Nilkumar Patel, Aragaw Gebeyehu, Mandip Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Keratin-Laden Bioink for Corneal Stroma Bioprinting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. 3D Printing Strategies for Bioengineering Human Cornea.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Focus on seed cells: stem cells in 3D bioprinting of corneal grafts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Three-dimensional bioprinting in ophthalmic care.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shallu KutlehriaCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Thanh Cong DinhCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Arvind BagdeCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Nilkumar PatelCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Aragaw GebeyehuCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Mandip SinghCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University · US

Funding

Research Project-3: Effectiveness of an eHealth intervention for uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic womenU54MD007582 · NIMHD · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI Eunsook Yu Lee · 2019 to 2026
$28.1M
Recruitment and HiringG12MD007582 · NIMHD · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI SOLIMAN, KARAM F.A. · 2012 to 2017
$16.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007582NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we designed high-throughput 3D bioprinting of corneal equivalents which may address the need for in vitro models. In our digital 3D cornea model, average dimensions of adult cornea were converted to 3D shapes, then to G-code files which were printed by BIOX printer (CELLINK). To maintain the curvature of cornea, a support scaffold was designed using stereolithographic printer. The support scaffold could facilitate the printing of 6-12 corneas at a time thus enabling high-throughput printing. Human corneal keratocytes (HCKs) were incorporated in the optimized bio-ink, and cell-laden corneal stromal equivalents were printed. Printed structures were cross-linked by calcium chloride 100 mM, washed with Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution and incubated at 37°C in fibroblast media. Printed corneas were analyzed for live dead assay, Alamar assay, and expression of fibronectin and actin green markers. Printed corneas were able to maintain their structure, integrity, and clarity. Live dead assay and Alamar assay demonstrated that HCKs maintained high viability (>95%) for 2 weeks. HCKs in the printed corneas showed expression for fibronectin and actin green. In conclusion, high-throughput fabrication of 3D printed corneal stromal equivalents using a combination of stereolithography printing, extrusion based printing, and micro-transfer molding techniques was achieved.

Indexed as

BioprintingPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringCells, CulturedCorneaHumansHydrogelsKeratinocytesTissue ScaffoldsHydrogels3D bioprintingbio-inkcorneahigh-throughputhydrogel

Identifiers

PMID32386281
PMCPMC7785091
OpenAlexW3021738118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.