ArticleACR open rheumatology2020
Probiotic Use and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of probiotic supplementation in PsA-a randomized controlled trial.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Trial
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Multi-Strain Probiotic Capsules for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Nutritional guidance in spondyloarthritis: confronting the evidence gap.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2025Review
- Revisiting articular syndrome in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era.Rheumatology international · 2023Review
- Triple jump for the optimal management of psoriatic arthritis: diet, sleep and exercise - a review.RMD open · 2023Review
- Psoriatic arthritis from a mechanistic perspective.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- Spondyloarthritis: How far are we from precision medicine?Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveProbiotics have been hypothesized to mediate inflammation through gut microbiome modulation. Spondyloarthropathies have subclinical gut inflammation associated with inflammatory disease that may benefit from probiotic use. We aimed to evaluate associations between probiotic use and patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
methodsUsing FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, we examined probiotic use among patients with PsA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a comparator in which gut inflammation is less clearly related to pathogenesis. Patient-reported outcome measures such as pain and physical function were compared for probiotic users and nonusers among patients with PsA and RA. Patients were propensity score-matched for taking a probiotic by demographics and nonmedication supplements.
resultsMore patients have reported probiotic use over the past decade, with less than 1% reporting use in 2008 and approximately 7% in 2018. Probiotic users are more likely to be white women with higher education, income, and supplement use. Following propensity score matching, probiotic users with PsA had significantly lower Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) scores and higher pain scores than nonusers with PsA (33.11 ± 11.50 vs. 40.82 ± 11.03; P = 0.04 and 4.78 ± 3.09 vs. 3.00 ± 2.58; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in Patient Activity Scale II, Health Assessment Questionnaire II, SF-36 PCS, and Short Form 36 Mental Component Summary scores or pain among users with PsA before and after probiotic initiation.
conclusionWe found increasing probiotic use in patients with PsA and important differences between users and nonusers. After accounting for these differences, we found no statistical difference in health outcomes after probiotic use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.