Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32386071›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.

Pauline Macaire, Justine Paris, Julie Vincent, François Ghiringhelli, Leïla Bengrine-Lefevre, Antonin Schmitt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline MacairePharmacy Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-7963
Justine ParisPharmacy Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Julie VincentOncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
François GhiringhelliINSERM U1231, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Leïla Bengrine-LefevreOncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Antonin SchmittPharmacy Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-7730
Inserm · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is frequently prescribed to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but the administration schedule remains empirical in case of bimonthly chemotherapy such as FOLFIRINOX regimen. This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was performed to determine the effect of different G-CSF regimens on the incidence and duration of neutropenia following FOLFIRINOX administration in order to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule.

methodsA population PK/PD model was developed to describe individual neutrophil time course from absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) obtained in 40 advanced cancer patients receiving FOLFIRINOX regimen. The structural model considered ANC dynamics, neutropenic effect of cytotoxics and the stimulating effect of G-CSF on neutrophils. Final model estimates were used to simulate different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects. The incidence and duration of neutropenia were then calculated for different G-CSF dosing schedules.

resultsThe final model successfully described the myelosuppressive effect induced by the 3 cytotoxics for all patients. Simulations showed that pegfilgrastim administration reduced the risk of severe neutropenia by 22.9% for subjects with low ANC at the start of chemotherapy. Median duration in this group was also shortened by 3.1 days when compared to absence of G-CSF. Delayed G-CSF administration was responsible for higher incidence and longer duration of neutropenia compared to absence of administration.

conclusionThe PK/PD model well described our population's ANC data. Simulations showed that pegylated-G-CSF administration 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy seems to be the optimal schedule to reduce FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia. We also underline the potential negative effect of G-CSF maladministration.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorNeutropeniaPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinRecombinant ProteinsFluorouracilfolfirinoxGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinRecombinant Proteinsadverse drug reactionsmodelling and simulationoncologypopulation analysis

Identifiers

PMID32386071
PMCPMC7688541
OpenAlexW3023085301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.