Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385804›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Pharmacotherapeutic Options for Managing Pain in Multiple Sclerosis.

Giulia Di Stefano, Gianfranco De Stefano, Andrea Di Lionardo, Giorgio Cruccu, Andrea Truini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia Di StefanoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco De StefanoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Di LionardoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio CruccuDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. giorgio.cruccu@uniroma1.it.
Andrea TruiniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a major matter for patients with multiple sclerosis; treatment response is frequently inadequate, with a significant impact on quality of life. The estimated prevalence of pain in multiple sclerosis ranges widely (26-86%), and different subtypes of pain, mediated by specific pathophysiological mechanisms, are described. The aim of this narrative review, performed using a systematic search methodology, was to provide current, evidence-based, knowledge about the pharmacological treatment of the different kinds of pain in multiple sclerosis. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov), considering publications up to November 2019. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, data extraction, and bias assessment. A total of 27 randomized controlled trials were identified, but in only a few cases, patients with different pain qualities were stratified. Following a mechanism-based approach, treatment of paroxysmal pain and painful tonic spasms should be based on sodium-channel blockers, whereas treatment of ongoing extremity pain should be based on gabapentinoids and antidepressants.

Indexed as

AnimalsChronic PainClinical Trials as TopicHumansMultiple SclerosisPain ManagementQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium Channel BlockersSodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID32385804
OpenAlexW3021738678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.