Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385741›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Longitudinal effects of rTMS on neuroplasticity in chronic treatment-resistant depression.

Iris Dalhuisen, Eveline Ackermans, Lieke Martens, Peter Mulders, Joey Bartholomeus, Alex de Bruijn, Jan Spijker, Philip van Eijndhoven, Indira Tendolkar

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Iris Dalhuisen *Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. iris.dalhuisen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-6498
Eveline Ackermans *Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lieke MartensDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter MuldersDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joey BartholomeusDepartment of Psychiatry, Rijnstate Hospital, PO Box 9555, 6800 TA, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Alex de BruijnPro Persona Mental Health Care, PO Box 7049, 6503 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan SpijkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Philip van Eijndhoven *Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Indira Tendolkar *Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Huispost 961, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is amongst the most prevalent of psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, a third of patients will not respond to conventional treatments and suffer from treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been proven effective in treating TRD. The research suggests that rTMS acts via neuroplastic effects on the brain, which can be measured by changes in hippocampal and amygdala volume as well as cortical thickness. This sham-controlled study investigates longitudinal effects of rTMS on the volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala and cortical thickness in patients with chronic TRD. 31 patients received 20 sessions of high-frequency rTMS (N = 15) or sham treatment (N = 16) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during 4 consecutive weeks. Using structural magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated longitudinal treatment effects on hippocampus and amygdala volume as well as thickness of the paralimbic cortex. We found no clinical differences between the active and sham rTMS group. Longitudinal changes in hippocampal and amygdala volume did not differ significantly, although males showed a significant decrease in left amygdala volume, irrespective of treatment group. Changes in cortical thickness of the paralimbic cortex differed significantly between the active and sham groups. Most notably, the increase in cortical thickness of the isthmus of the left cingulate gyrus was greater in the active as compared to the sham rTMS group. Our data suggest that rTMS can induce neuroplastic changes, particularly in cortical thickness, independent of treatment response. We also found longitudinal changes in amygdala volume in males. For clinical effects to follow these neuroplastic effects, more intensive rTMS treatment might be needed in chronically depressed patients.Trial registration number: ISRCTN 15535800, registered on 29-06-2017.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAmygdalaCingulate gyrusCortical thicknessDepressionHippocampusNeuroplasticityrTMS

Identifiers

PMID32385741
PMCPMC7867550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.