Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385704›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2020

Evaluation of implementation of risk management guidelines for carriers of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes: a nationwide audit of familial cancer clinics.

B Meiser, R Kaur, J Kirk, A Morrow, M Peate, W K T Wong, E McPike, E Cops, C Dowson, R Austin and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: Universal Germline vs Sequential Screening.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

B MeiserPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. b.meiser@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-0784
R KaurPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J KirkCrown Princess Mary Cancer Centre at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
A MorrowPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
M PeatePsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
W K T WongPsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
E McPikePsychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
E CopsParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
C DowsonGenetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth and School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
R AustinRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Genetic Health Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
M FineAdult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
L ThruppParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
R WardUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
F MacraeDepartment of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J E HillerSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
A H TrainerParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
G MitchellParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
ICCon Audit Study Collaborative Group
UNSW Sydney · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUWestmead Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis nationwide study assessed the impact of Lynch syndrome-related risk management guidelines on clinicians' recommendations of risk management strategies to carriers of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes and the extent to which carriers took up strategies in concordance with guidelines. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinic files of 464 carriers (with and without colorectal cancer) were audited for carriers who received their genetic testing results in July 2008-July 2009 (i.e. before guideline release), July 2010-July 2011 and July 2012-July 2013 (both after guideline release) at 12 familial cancer clinics (FCCs) to ascertain the extent to which carriers were informed about risk management in accordance with guidelines. All carriers captured by the audit were invited to participate in interviews; 215 were interviewed to assess adherence to recommended risk management guidelines.

resultsThe rates of documentation in clinic files increased significantly from pre- to post-guideline for only two out of eight risk management strategies. The strategies with the highest compliance of carriers post-guidelines were: uptake of one or two-yearly colonoscopy (87%), followed by hysterectomy to prevent endometrial cancer (68%), aspirin as risk-reducing medication (67%) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (63%). Interrater reliability check for all guidelines showed excellent agreement (k statistics = 0.89).

conclusionThese results indicate that there is scope to further increase provision of advice at FCCs to ensure that all carriers receive recommendations about evidence-based risk management. A multi-pronged behaviour change and implementation science approach tailored to specific barriers is likely to be needed to achieve optimal clinician behaviours and outcomes for carriers.

Indexed as

HeterozygoteRisk AssessmentAdultAnticarcinogenic AgentsAspirinColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGastroscopyGenetic TestingGuideline AdherenceHumansHysterectomyAnticarcinogenic AgentsAspirinCancer riskComplianceGenetic testingGuidelinesImplementationLynch syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32385704
OpenAlexW3023475923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.