ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2020
[Transanal resection procedures-current status].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transanal resection procedures are special surgical methods for the minimally invasive treatment of rectal tumors. Apart from benign tumors, this operative procedure is suitable for the excision of so-called low-risk T1 rectal carcinomas, if these can be completely removed up to healthy tissue (R0 resection) due to the size and localization. With stringent patient selection very good oncological results are achieved. Various international trials are currently evaluating whether local resection procedures are oncologically sufficient when there is complete or near complete remission after neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Numerous studies have confirmed that in particular the functional results and the postoperative quality of life after local resection are excellent, especially considering the well-known functional deficits of alternative operations, such as low rectal resection or abdominoperineal extirpation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32385633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.