ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Acute and chronic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and postural balance: a review.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospects for the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia in the Philippines.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Neuromuscular or Sensory Electrical Stimulation for Reconditioning Motor Output and Postural Balance in Older Subjects?Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeElectro-induced (EI) muscle actions are largely used in healthy subjects to improve motor performance, in frail/older subjects to limit sarcopenia and mobility loss, and in pathological subjects to restore functional abilities after injury and/or surgical operation. Their effects on motor output (e.g., muscle strength and power, and motor performance) are relatively well known, but their effects on postural balance are not. However, postural balance turns out to be a determining factor for motor skills in terms of motor performance and prevention of falls (especially in older/frail and pathological subjects). Hence, this review addresses the acute and chronic effects of EI muscle actions on postural balance, comparing them to the effects of voluntary (VOL) muscle actions.
methodNarrative review.
resultIn acute, fatigue-generating application, EI muscle actions impair postural balance but less than VOL muscle actions. In chronic application, EI muscle actions induce beneficial effects on postural balance in pathological and aged (or frail) subjects. However, they have no or very little impact on healthy and young subjects. In aged (and probably pathological) subjects, EI muscle actions alone or superimposed onto voluntary contractions (EI + VOL) are less efficient than VOL muscle actions in improving postural balance.
conclusionIn practice, as part of populations too frail/fragile or unable (sarcopenic or pathological persons) to regularly undertake VOL motor tasks required to efficiently struggle against the loss of mobility and the risk of fall, the EI muscle actions turn out to be particularly relevant to implement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.