ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020
[Process optimization in the operating room area].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison between a maximum care university hospital and an outpatient clinic - potential for optimization in arthroscopic workflows?BMC health services research · 2023Article
- [Influencing factors on operating times for metal bar removal after Nuss repair].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe operating room (OR) accounts for the highest fraction of hospital costs and also has the largest proportion of revenue. Classical goals of optimizing OR efficiency are to increase the quality of treatment and economic success. As the reduction of qualified personnel as the largest cost factor was favored for many years, nowadays a shortage of nursing personnel is threatening the surgery departments in many German hospitals.
objectiveWhich improvements are possible while the OR already suffers from restrictions? What are critical resources, what are the critical burdens and how can they be optimized? MATERIAL AND
methodsAn analysis of the OR organization of an orthopedic and traumatology department with reduced OR capacity due to a shortage of OR and anesthesia nursing personnel was performed. This was followed by the evaluation of possible alterations with the corresponding advantages and disadvantages. After selection and implementation, the qualitative and quantitative differences were examined before and after the alterations.
resultsMultifaceted problem areas could be identified. The establishment of a fast track OR with concentration of additional resources on many fast points in an OR instead of on a few complex cases was selected and implemented. The installation of a holding area for patients waiting for surgery eliminated transportation delays almost entirely. Alterations in the OR planning and capacity distribution reduced nocturnal operating times. Despite reduction of the OR capacity both the number of operations performed and the incision to suture times could be increased.
conclusionOptimization of the processes in the OR is possible and necessary, despite the lack of personnel. Even only a few structural changes can eliminate bottlenecks, resulting in qualitative and quantitative improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32385538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.