Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385293›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A Combined Study of Headspace Volatiles using Human Sensory, Mass Spectrometry and Chemometrics.

K G McAdam, J Tetteh, L Bishop, H Digard, J Cote, S Lubbe, C Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K G McAdamMcAdam Scientific Ltd., 50 Leigh Road, Eastleigh, SO509DT, UK. kevin@mcadamscience.com.
J TettehDiKnow Ltd., 84 Rushdean Road, Rochester, Kent, ME2 2QB, United Kingdom.
L BishopResearch and Development, British American Tobacco Investments Ltd., Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
H DigardResearch and Development, British American Tobacco Investments Ltd., Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
J CoteResearch and Development, British American Tobacco Investments Ltd., Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
S LubbeDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa.
C LiuResearch and Development, British American Tobacco Investments Ltd., Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smokeless tobacco products (STPs) are widely used in certain parts of the world, yet there is limited understanding of how they are consumed, particularly the impact of chemosensory characteristics on their use. In order to develop an understanding of the drivers of STP use and product acceptability we conducted both human sensory panel testing and chemical analyses on a range of STPs. Free-sorting paired odour testing using sensory panellists identified similarities and clear differences between eleven different STPs. Headspace volatiles, analysed by headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), identified 20 to 70 components depending upon the STP. Key differences in headspace volatiles were found between STPs. For example, the headspace of Skoal Bandits Wintergreen was dominated by methyl salicylate, while Marlboro Spice consists of a more complex profile including pinene, nicotine, eugenol and cymene. Chemometric Target Factor Analysis (TFA) and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) of chemistry and sensory data was used to deduce chemical drivers of sensory perceptions. The chemometric strategy used showed that headspace analysis is a complementary screening tool to sensory analysis in classification studies. This study is generic with applications across various product sectors that require routine human sensory panel evaluation.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometrySmellSmokingCluster AnalysisGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansOlfactory PerceptionSolid Phase MicroextractionVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.