Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385143›Full record

Observational studyRMD open2020

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland.

A Finckh, C Tellenbach, L Herzog, A Scherer, B Moeller, A Ciurea, I von Muehlenen, C Gabay, D Kyburz, L Brulhart and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

A FinckhDepartment of Internal Medicine Specialties, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
C TellenbachStatistics Group, SCQM Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.
L HerzogStatistics Group, SCQM Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.
A SchererStatistics Group, SCQM Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.
B MoellerInselspital und Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
A CiureaUniversity Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
I von MuehlenenPrivate Practice, Basel, Switzerland.
C GabayDepartment of Internal Medicine Specialties, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
D KyburzDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
L BrulhartRheumatology, Réseau hospitalier neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds,Switzerland.
R MüllerKantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
P HaslerKantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
P ZuffereyCentres Hospitaliers Universitaires Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
physicians and patients of the SCQM
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHSCQM Foundation · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHFreiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft · CHInternational Museum of Horology · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.

objectiveTo compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.

methodsThis observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

results4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.

conclusionTofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesProspective StudiesPyrimidinesAbataceptAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPyrimidinestofacitinibTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsabataceptbiological therapiescomparative effectiveness researchrheumatoid arthritistocilizumabtumour necrosis alpha inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32385143
PMCPMC7299517
OpenAlexW3021665373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.