Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32385070›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2022

Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment.

Frits A Boom, Judith M Ris, Tjitske Veenbaas, Paul P H Le Brun, Daan Touw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part B: risk control.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frits A BoomZaans Medical Centre, Zaandam, Noord-Holland 1502DV, The Netherlands fritsboom70@gmail.com.
Judith M RisZaans Medical Centre, Zaandam, Noord-Holland 1502DV, The Netherlands.
Tjitske VeenbaasAlbert Schweitzer Hospital Location Dordwijk, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland 3318 AT, The Netherlands.
Paul P H Le BrunDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daan TouwClinical Pharmacy, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Zaans Medisch Centrum · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLDialyse Centrum Groningen · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine prospectively the sources of risk of non-sterility during aseptic handling and to quantify the risks of each of these sources.

methodsA risk assessment (RA) of non-sterility according to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was executed by a multidisciplinary team of (hospital) pharmacists and technicians, a consultant experienced in aseptic processing and an independent facilitator. The team determined the sources of risk of non-sterility, a 5 point scale for severity, occurrence and detection, and risk acceptance levels. Input about general applied risk reduction was collected by audits in 10 hospital pharmacies. The results of these audits were used for determining the remaining risks. The results, as well as scientific information and the experience of the team members, was used to determine scores for severity, occurrence and detection.

resultsMultiplying the scores for severity, occurrence and detection results in the risk prioritisation number (RPN) which is a relative value of the remaining risks of non-sterility for each source. Incorrect disinfection techniques of non-sterile materials and the chances of touching critical spots were estimated as the greatest risks. The risk of non-sterility via the airborne route was low. RPN values were helpful in prioritising measures for additional risk reduction (this will be described in an accompanying article).

conclusionThe RA, described here, was a systematic survey related to all sources of risk of non-sterility during aseptic handling. The determined RPN values were helpful in prioritising measures for additional risk reduction.

Indexed as

PharmaciesHospitalsHumansPharmacistsRisk Assessmentaseptic preparationaudit, self-inspectioncompounding (individualised preparation)disinfectionGood Manufacturing Practice (GMP)manufacturing, small scaleprotocols & guidelinesreconstitutionrisk managementvalidation preparation process

Identifiers

PMID32385070
PMCPMC9047930
OpenAlexW3021366247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.