Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384806›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait during the 6-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.

Fabio Alexander Storm, Ambra Cesareo, Gianluigi Reni, Emilia Biffi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855577 (-Clinical Efficacy of Pharmacological Treatments Targeting Energy Metabolism, Evaluated by Gait Analysis, on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05855577 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

-Clinical Efficacy of Pharmacological Treatments Targeting Energy Metabolism, Evaluated by Gait Analysis, on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsParkinson Disease, Gait Analysis, Therapy, Directly Observed, Metabolic DiseaseArmsTerazosin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio Alexander StormScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bioengineering Lab, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-8090
Ambra CesareoScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bioengineering Lab, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Gianluigi ReniScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bioengineering Lab, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0822-3287
Emilia BiffiScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bioengineering Lab, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente 2019 to Eng. Gianluigi ReniMinistero della Salute Ricerca Corrente 2020 to Dr. Emilia Biffi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable sensors are becoming increasingly popular for complementing classical clinical assessments of gait deficits. The aim of this review is to examine the existing knowledge by systematically reviewing a large number of papers focusing on the use of wearable inertial sensors for the assessment of gait during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a widely recognized, simple, non-invasive, low-cost and reproducible exercise test. After a systematic search on PubMed and Scopus databases, two raters evaluated the quality of 28 full-text articles. Then, the available knowledge was summarized regarding study design, subjects enrolled (number of patients and pathological condition, if any, age, male/female ratio), sensor characteristics (type, number, sampling frequency, range) and body placement, 6MWT protocol and extracted parameters. Results were critically discussed to suggest future directions for the use of inertial sensor devices in the clinics.

Indexed as

GaitWalk TestWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult6-minute walk testgaitMIMUswearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID32384806
PMCPMC7249076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.