Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384716›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

An Intelligent Non-Invasive Real-Time Human Activity Recognition System for Next-Generation Healthcare.

William Taylor, Syed Aziz Shah, Kia Dashtipour, Adnan Zahid, Qammer H Abbasi, Muhammad Ali Imran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William TaylorJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Syed Aziz ShahJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Kia DashtipourJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Adnan ZahidJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Qammer H AbbasiJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7097-9969
Muhammad Ali ImranJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-9136

Funding

Scottish Funding Council EPSRC DTG EP/N509668/1 Eng
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human motion detection is getting considerable attention in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven healthcare systems. Human motion can be used to provide remote healthcare solutions for vulnerable people by identifying particular movements such as falls, gait and breathing disorders. This can allow people to live more independent lifestyles and still have the safety of being monitored if more direct care is needed. At present wearable devices can provide real-time monitoring by deploying equipment on a person's body. However, putting devices on a person's body all the time makes it uncomfortable and the elderly tend to forget to wear them, in addition to the insecurity of being tracked all the time. This paper demonstrates how human motions can be detected in a quasi-real-time scenario using a non-invasive method. Patterns in the wireless signals present particular human body motions as each movement induces a unique change in the wireless medium. These changes can be used to identify particular body motions. This work produces a dataset that contains patterns of radio wave signals obtained using software-defined radios (SDRs) to establish if a subject is standing up or sitting down as a test case. The dataset was used to create a machine learning model, which was used in a developed application to provide a quasi-real-time classification of standing or sitting state. The machine-learning model was able to achieve 96.70% accuracy using the Random Forest algorithm using 10 fold cross-validation. A benchmark dataset of wearable devices was compared to the proposed dataset and results showed the proposed dataset to have similar accuracy of nearly 90%. The machine-learning models developed in this paper are tested for two activities but the developed system is designed and applicable for detecting and differentiating x number of activities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHuman ActivitiesWearable Electronic DevicesAgedComputer SystemsDelivery of Health CareHumanschannel state informationhuman motion detectionKNNmachine learningneural networksrandom forestreal-time classificationSVMUSRP

Identifiers

PMID32384716
PMCPMC7248832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.