ArticleMedicine2020
Relationship between T stage and survival in distantly metastatic esophageal cancer: A STROBE-compliant study.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- RegGAN-based contrast-free CT enhances esophageal cancer assessment: multicenter validation of automated tumor segmentation and T-staging.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for patients with cT1-4N1-3M1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: based on the SEER database and the Chinese cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- The influence of antibiotic administration on the outcomes of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive (chemo)radiation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Review
- State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Esophageal wall thickness on CT scans: can it predict the T stage of primary thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2022Article
- Comment on "Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis".Translational oncology · 2022Article
- A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Sex differences in tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of gastric and esophageal cancer surgery: nationwide cohort data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022Article
- Implications of prognosis-associated genes in pancreatic tumor metastasis: lessons from global studies in bioinformatics.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To shed light on the interaction between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage and M stage in the determination of the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of esophageal carcinoma patients. Moreover, to confirm our hypothesis that tumors that metastasize to distant sites in the early T stage may reflect a more biologically aggressive disease compared with those that metastasize in more advanced T stages.We performed a retrospective cohort study with patients who were pathologically diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2014 in the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. The primary study variables were the T and M stage, as well as their interaction terms. We performed a survival analysis of the interaction terms using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier methods and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Furthermore, we performed an exploratory analysis with stratification by histological type, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Data of 19,078 patients were retrieved from the SEER database. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that patients with T2 and T3 stage had longer median OS and CSS (3 months and 4 months, respectively) than with T1 stage in distantly metastatic esophageal cancer (M1 stage). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant interaction between the T stage and M stage when determining the OS and CSS of esophageal cancer (P < .001). Using T1M0 as a reference, patients with T1M1 had significantly worse OS and CSS than those with T2M1 and T3M1 stage (P < .001). A similar pattern was also observed among patients with EAC and ESCC.Our analysis suggests that the T1 stage predicts worse survival compared with T2 and T3 stage in distantly metastatic esophageal cancer and might be a surrogate for biologically aggressive disease, indicating that those patients should receive more aggressive treatments. Our findings also encourage researchers to discover new genomic changes in this subset of tumors with the potential to uncover new prognostic markers or drug targets. Further researches on the association between T stage and survival in metastatic esophageal cancer are warranted to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.