Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384455›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

The prognostic and clinicopathological significance of RBM3 in the survival of patients with tumor: A Prisma-compliant meta-analysis.

Guangyu Gao, Xinya Shi, Yuming Long, Zhen Yao, Jiaofeng Shen, Liqin Shen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guangyu GaoDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.
Xinya Shi
Yuming Long
Zhen Yao
Jiaofeng Shen
Liqin Shen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-binding motif protein 3 (RBM3) plays an important role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. However, the prognostic role of RBM3 in human carcinomas remains controversial. Therefore, we took a meta-analysis to research the association between the overall survival of patients with cancer and the expression of RBM3.

methodsSystematic literature research identified 17 potentially eligible studies comprising 4976 patients in ten different cancer types. Two researchers independently screened the content and quality of studies and extracted data. Correlations of RBM3 expression and survival were analyzed and the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

resultsIn the pooled analysis, overexpression of RBM3 was related to improved overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with cancer having a pooled HR of 0.61 (HR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.69), 0.57 (HR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50-0.71) and 0.54 (HR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38-0.78). Besides, subgroup analysis proved that overexpression of RBM3 was related to improved OS in colorectal cancer (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86), melanoma (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.52), and gastric cancer (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.73). However, subgroup analysis according to tumor type revealed that overexpression of RBM3 was not related to better OS in breast carcinoma (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.17-0.61).

conclusionsOur results indicated that RBM3 overexpression was significantly predictive of better prognosis in various human cancers. For certain tumors, overexpression RBM3 might be a marker of improved survival in humans with cancer, except for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionNeoplasmsHumansPrognosisRNA-Binding ProteinsSurvival AnalysisRBM3 protein, humanRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32384455
PMCPMC7220349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.