Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384448›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Moxibustion for treating knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Xue Wang, Yunfeng Jiang, Jun Xiong, Ting Yuan, Jun Yang, Xiaohong Zhou, Kai Liao, Lingling Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xue WangJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Yunfeng JiangAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, PR China.
Jun XiongAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, PR China.
Ting YuanJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Jun YangJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Xiaohong ZhouAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, PR China.
Kai LiaoAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, PR China.
Lingling XuAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a significant health issue because it causes pain and functional limitation. Many studies have reported that moxibustion, a treatment in traditional Chinese medicine, is effective in treating KOA. The aim of this overview is to synthesize and assess the reliability of evidence generated from these systematic reviews of the effectiveness of moxibusition for KOA.

methodsThis is a protocol for a systematic overview of reviews. We will search 7 databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literatures Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WangFang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database from their inception to April 2020. We will consider systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of moxibustion for KOA. Independent reviewers will sift, perform data extraction in duplicate, and assess the quality of the reviews using the Change MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 and the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The outcomes of interest include: quality of life, knee function, and pain relief outcomes prioritized in the individual reviews. The evidence will be synthesized where appropriate by patient subgroups, intervention type, context, and outcome. Revman 5.3 software will be used to conduct meta-analysis and calculate the risk ratio for dichotomous data. Weighted mean difference or standard mean difference will be calculated for continuous data. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) considering the methodological quality of the randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis.

resultsThe results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

conclusionsWe expect to compile evidence from multiple systematic reviews of symptomatic improvement in patients with KOA in an accessible and useful document. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019141029 in PROSPERO 2019.

Indexed as

HumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMeta-Analysis as TopicMoxibustionOsteoarthritis, KneeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32384448
PMCPMC7220301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.