Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384444›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations vs alternative antibiotics in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Li-Chin Lu, Chih-Cheng Lai, Shen-Peng Chang, Shao-Huan Lan, Shun-Hsing Hung, Wei-Ting Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotic adjuvants: synergistic tool to combat multi-drug resistant pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Li-Chin LuSchool of Management, Putian University, Putian, China.
Chih-Cheng LaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Tainan Branch.
Shen-Peng ChangYijia Pharmacy, Tainan, Taiwan.
Shao-Huan LanSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medical Technology, Putian University, Putian, China.
Shun-Hsing HungDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Hospital, Chia Li.
Wei-Ting LinDepartment of Orthopedic, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWPutian University · CNKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/acute pyelonephritis (APN).

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO (Elton B. Stephens Co.), Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases were accessed until November 21, 2019. In this meta-analysis, only randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment efficacy of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics for cUTI/APN in adult patients were included. The outcomes included the clinical and microbiological responses, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

resultsOverall, the experimental group treated with a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and the control group comprised 1346 and 1376 patients, respectively. No significant difference in the clinical response rate at test-of-cure was observed between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (89.1% vs 88.3%, OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.42; I = 28%) and the microbiologically evaluable population (95.2% vs 94.7%, OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84; I = 0%). Additionally, the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was associated with a better microbiological response at test-of-cure than the comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (74.4% vs 68.5%, OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72; I = 45%) and microbiologically evaluable population (80.1% vs 72.5%, OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.06-2.10; I = 58%). Finally, the risk of AEs associated with the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was similar to that associated with the comparators (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE], OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23; I = 19%; serious AEs, OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.82-1.76; I = 0%; treatment discontinuation for drug-related TEAE, OR, 077; 95% CI, 0.38-1.56, I = 5%). The all-cause mortality did not differ between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.37-3.81; I = 0%).

conclusionsThe clinical and microbiological responses of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of cUTI/APN are similar to those of other available antibiotics. These combinations also share a safety profile similar to that of other antibiotics.

Indexed as

PyelonephritisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID32384444
PMCPMC7220034
OpenAlexW3021358781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.