Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384431›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter analgesics for primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis.

Wenbo Nie, Ping Xu, Chunyan Hao, Yingying Chen, Yanling Yin, Lisheng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dysmenorrhea and psychological distress: a meta-analysis.Archives of women's mental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What a pain in the … back: a review of current treatment options with a focus on naproxen sodium.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenbo NieSchool of Nursing, Jilin University.
Ping XuSchool of Nursing, Jilin University.
Chunyan HaoGynecology and Integrated Care Unit, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Yingying ChenSchool of Nursing, Jilin University.
Yanling YinDean's Office, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lisheng WangSchool of Nursing, Jilin University.
Jilin University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary dysmenorrhea is common and troublesome. The comparative efficacy of over-the-counter analgesics (OTCAs) for dysmenorrhea is unclear. This study was aimed at conducting a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of 5 OTCAs - naproxen, ibuprofen,diclofenac, aspirin, and ketoprofen - in patients with primary dysmenorrhea.

methodsThe study was registered with PROSPERO (number: CRD42019133556). The search strategy involved a review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL for relative randomized controlled trials of the 5 analgesics from the date of database establishment to July 2019. The outputs are presented as odds ratios (ORs), their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) probabilities.

resultsThirty-five trials with 4383 participants were included in our study. As for efficacy outcomes, all the included analgesics except aspirin were more effective than placebo in treating dysmenorrhea [naproxen (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.18-7.30), ibuprofen (OR 10.08, 95% CI 3.29-30.85), diclofenac (OR 11.82, 95% CI 2.66-52.48), and ketoprofen (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.57-16.69). The OTCAs were superior to the placebo in terms of pain relief in primary dysmenorrhea. Aspirin was less effective than ibuprofen (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.73) and diclofenac (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.85). The SUCRA curves showed that diclofenac and ibuprofen were the most and second most effective (85.1% and 83.8%, respectively), followed by ketoprofen, naproxen, and aspirin. Regarding safety, there was no significant difference between the 5 OTCAs included and the placebo. Diclofenac versus ibuprofen (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.18-15.67), ketoprofen versus diclofenac (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.78), and ketoprofen versus aspirin (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.97) presented statistically significant differences. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were ranked the best (SUCRA 90.6% and 79.6%), followed by naproxen, aspirin, and diclofenac.

conclusionConsidering the efficacy and safety, ibuprofen is recommended as the optimal OTCA for primary dysmenorrhea. Further well-designed studies that directly compare these analgesics are needed to support our conclusion.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinDiclofenacDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansIbuprofenKetoprofenMiddle AgedNaproxenNonprescription DrugsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinDiclofenacIbuprofenKetoprofenNaproxenNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID32384431
PMCPMC7220209
OpenAlexW3021223202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.