Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384199›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2020

Acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed care and patient outcomes: A cluster-unit-level descriptive comparison.

Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina, Maribel González-Samartino, Maria Magdalena López-Jiménez, Maria Planas-Canals, Hugo Rodríguez-Fernández, Irene Joana Batuecas Duelt, Marta Tapia-Pérez, Mònica Pons Prats, Emilio Jiménez-Martínez, Miquel Àngel Barberà Llorca and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-UdinaNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-5653
Maribel González-SamartinoNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-8014
Maria Magdalena López-JiménezNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-2699
Maria Planas-CanalsDoctor Josep, Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8105-3080
Hugo Rodríguez-FernándezBellvitge University Hospital, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6926-3739
Irene Joana Batuecas DueltMultidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, VHIR Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-2918
Marta Tapia-PérezBellvitge University Hospital, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-6963
Mònica Pons PratsVerge de la Cinta Hospital, Tortosa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-7000
Emilio Jiménez-MartínezNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-037X
Miquel Àngel Barberà LlorcaGermans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4410-0172
Susana Asensio-FloresNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-1325
Carme Berbis-MorellóJoan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-9875
Esperanza Zuriguel-PérezMultidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, VHIR Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-8423
Pilar Delgado-HitoNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-3648
Óscar Rey LuqueNursing School, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-4775
Adelaida ZabaleguiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nursing School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-3997
Núria FabrellasFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nursing School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-0291
Jordi AdamuzNursing Research Group, IDIBELL, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-0981
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESHospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · ESHospital Universitari de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the patient acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed nursing care and patient outcomes among hospital unit-clusters.

backgroundRelationships among acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed nursing care and patient outcomes are not completely understood.

methodDescriptive design with data from four unit-clusters: medical, surgical, combined and step-down units. Descriptive statistics were used to compare acuity, nurse staffing coverage, education and expertise, missed nursing care and selected nurse-sensitive outcomes.

resultsPatient acuity in general (medical, surgical and combined) floors is similar to step-down units, with an average of 5.6 required RN hours per patient day. In general wards, available RN hours per patient day reach only 50% of required RN hours to meet patient needs. Workforce measures are comparable among unit-clusters, and average missed nursing care is 21%. Patient outcomes vary among unit-clusters.

conclusionPatient acuity is similar among unit-clusters, while nurse staffing coverage is halved in general wards. While RN education, expertise and missed care are comparable among unit-clusters, mortality, skin injuries and risk of family compassion fatigue rates are higher in general wards. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers play a pivotal role in hustling policymakers to address structural understaffing in general wards, to maximize patient safety outcomes.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingCross-Sectional StudiesHospital UnitsHumansWorkforceacuitymissed nursing carepatient outcomespatient safetystaffing

Identifiers

PMID32384199
PMCPMC7754324
OpenAlexW3021618556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.