Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384198›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989)2020

Receptive anal sex contributes substantially to heterosexually acquired HIV infections among at-risk women in twenty US cities: Results from a modelling analysis.

Jocelyn Elmes, Romain Silhol, Kristen L Hess, Lukyn M Gedge, Ashley Nordsletten, Roisin Staunton, Peter Anton, Barbara Shacklett, Ian McGowan, Que Dang and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Jocelyn ElmesDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-5465
Romain SilholDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-7609
Kristen L HessDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lukyn M GedgeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ashley NordslettenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Roisin StauntonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Peter AntonDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Barbara ShacklettDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-732X
Ian McGowanSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Que DangVaccine Research Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, Rockville, NIH, MD, USA.
Adaora A AdimoraSchool of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dobromir T DimitrovVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sevgi AralDivision of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Senad HandanagicDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gabriela Paz-BaileyDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marie-Claude BoilyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-006X
Imperial College London · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USOffice of AIDS Research · USRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GBUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Prevention Trials NetworkUM1AI068619 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 2011 to 2026
$779.5M
SDMC: HPTN 084 Pregnancy SupplementUM1AI068617 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Elizabeth Renata Brown, Deborah J Donnell · 2011 to 2026
$204.9M
HIV-Specific T Cell Responses in Rectal MucosaR01AI057020 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI SHACKLETT, BARBARA L. · 2003 to 2016
$6.2M
Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI057020NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068617NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemReceptive anal intercourse (RAI) is more efficient than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) at transmitting HIV, but its contribution to heterosexually acquired HIV infections among at-risk women in the USA is unclear. METHOD OF STUDY: We analysed sexual behaviour data from surveys of 9152 low-income heterosexual women living in 20 cities with high rates of HIV conducted in 2010 and 2013 as part of US National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. We estimated RAI prevalence (past-year RAI) and RAI fraction (fraction of all sex acts (RVI and RAI) at the last sexual episode that were RAI among those reporting past-year RAI) overall and by key demographic characteristics. These results and HIV incidence were used to calibrate a risk equation model to estimate the population attributable fraction of new HIV infections due to RAI (PAF

resultsReceptive anal intercourse prevalence (overall: 32%, city range: 19%-60%) and RAI fraction (overall: 27%, city range: 18%-34%) were high overall and across cities, and positively associated with exchange sex. RAI accounted for an estimated 41% (uncertainty range: 18%-55%) of new infections overall (city range: 21%-57%). Variability in PAF

conclusionReceptive anal intercourse may contribute disproportionately to new heterosexually acquired HIV infections among at-risk low-income women in the USA, meaning that tools to prevent HIV transmission during RAI are warranted. The number of RVI and RAI acts should also be collected to monitor heterosexually acquired HIV infections.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHeterosexualityHIVHIV InfectionsHumansModels, StatisticalPovertyPrevalenceRiskSemenSexual BehaviorUnited StatesUnsafe SexUrban Populationanal sexheterosexualHIVsexual behaviourUSAwomen

Identifiers

PMID32384198
PMCPMC7485995
OpenAlexW3021074069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.