Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32384120›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Katleen Fagard, Albert Wolthuis, Marleen Verhaegen, Johan Flamaing, Mieke Deschodt

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Before-and-After Study of the First Four Years of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERASInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katleen FagardDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5886-4432
Albert WolthuisDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marleen VerhaegenDepartment of Anesthesia, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan FlamaingDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mieke DeschodtDivision of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery have demonstrated beneficial effects on postoperative complications, return of bowel function, length of stay, and costs, without increasing readmissions or mortality. However, ERPs were not specifically designed for older patients and feasibility in older patients has been questioned.

aimThe aim of this study was to assess ERP adherence and outcomes in older patients and to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and prolonged length of stay.

methodRetrospective analysis of consecutive patients (≥70 years) undergoing elective colorectal resection in a tertiary referral hospital in 2017.

resultsNinety-six patients were included. Adherence rates were above 80% in 18 of 21 ERP interventions considered. The lowest adherence rates were noted for preoperative carbohydrate loading and cessation of intravenous fluids. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥2) and prolonged postoperative length of stay (>75th percentile) were observed in 39.6% and 26.3%, respectively. Median length of stay was 7 days. The 30-day mortality, readmission and reoperation rates were 2.1%, 12.6% and 8.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that polypharmacy and site of surgery were independent risk factors for postoperative complications, while higher age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative length of stay.

conclusionERP adherence in older patients undergoing colorectal resection is high and ERP is therefore considered feasible. Postoperative complications and prolonged postoperative length of stay are common, so at risk patients should be targeted with tailored geriatric interventions.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryElective Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLength of StayMalePatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32384120
PMCPMC7209103
OpenAlexW3022399191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.