ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Hemodynamic Change of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque After Statin Treatment: A Serial Follow-Up Study by Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial Coronary CTA for Monitoring Response to Lipid-Lowering Therapy: A Narrative Review.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Article
- The relationship between glycemic risk and longitudinal changes in total physiological atherosclerotic burden in patients with coronary artery disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- The Role of Fluid Mechanics in Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: An Up-to-Date Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Myocardial Bridging: Review on the Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of Radial Wall Strain on Serial Changes in Vascular Physiology in Patients with Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of Atorvastatin on Serial Changes in Coronary Physiology and Plaque Parameters.JACC. Asia · 2022Article
- Long-term prognostic value of the serial changes of CT-derived fractional flow reserve and perivascular fat attenuation index.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- CT Fractional Flow Reserve for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Bridging-Related Ischemia: A Study Using Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Reference Standard.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
- The Use of Subclinical Atherosclerosis Imaging to Guide Preventive Cardiology Management.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Hemodynamic Change of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque After Statin Treatment: A Serial Follow-Up Study by Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Whether statin treatment can improve hemodynamic status of coronary atherosclerotic plaque remains unknown. It is of clinical interest to explore the hemodynamic change of coronary lesions after statin treatment. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled and underwent baseline coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as well as follow-up CCTA. The primary end point was to determine the lesion-specific change of △computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (△CT-FFR, defined as the change of CT-FFR value across each lesion) after rosuvastatin treatment. The secondary end point was to compare the change of other plaque characteristics according to serial CCTA findings. 152 patients (mean age: 67.1±9.7 years, 100 men, mean follow-up duration of 13.9±2.5 months) were finally included. In non-calcified plaque subgroup, △CT-FFR was significantly lower at follow-up compared with baseline (0.051±0.010 versus 0.035±0.012,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.