Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383813›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2020

Phage biocontrol to combat Pseudomonas syringae pathogens causing disease in cherry.

Mojgan Rabiey, Shyamali R Roy, Dominique Holtappels, Linda Franceschetti, Billy J Quilty, Ryan Creeth, George W Sundin, Jeroen Wagemans, Rob Lavigne, Robert W Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mojgan RabieySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-9087
Shyamali R RoySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
Dominique HoltappelsLaboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Linda FranceschettiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
Billy J QuiltySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
Ryan CreethSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
George W SundinMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jeroen WagemansLaboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rob LavigneLaboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robert W JacksonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Knight Building, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
University of Reading · GBKU Leuven · BEForest Research · GBMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial canker is a major disease of Prunus species, such as cherry (Prunus avium). It is caused by Pseudomonas syringae pathovars, including P. syringae pv. syringae (Pss) and P. syringae pv. morsprunorum race 1 (Psm1) and race 2 (Psm2). Concerns over the environmental impact of, and the development of bacterial resistance to, traditional copper controls calls for new approaches to disease management. Bacteriophage-based biocontrol could provide a sustainable and natural alternative approach to combat bacterial pathogens. Therefore, seventy phages were isolated from soil, leaf and bark of cherry trees in six locations in the south east of England. Subsequently, their host range was assessed against strains of Pss, Psm1 and Psm2. While these phages lysed different Pss, Psm and some other P. syringae pathovar isolates, they did not infect beneficial bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens. A subset of thirteen phages were further characterized by genome sequencing, revealing five distinct clades in which the phages could be clustered. No known toxins or lysogeny-associated genes could be identified. Using bioassays, selected phages could effectively reduce disease progression in vivo, both individually and in cocktails, reinforcing their potential as biocontrol agents in agriculture.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPrunus aviumHost SpecificityPlant DiseasesPseudomonas syringae

Identifiers

PMID32383813
PMCPMC7415359
OpenAlexW3021108124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.