Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383767›Full record

Trial reportFEMS microbiology ecology2020

Effect of oral consumption of capsules containing Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-S01 on the vaginal microbiota of healthy adult women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study.

Ranjan Koirala, Giorgio Gargari, Stefania Arioli, Valentina Taverniti, Walter Fiore, Elena Grossi, Gaia Maria Anelli, Irene Cetin, Simone Guglielmetti

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Orally ingestedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjan KoiralaDivision of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Luigi Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GargariDivision of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Luigi Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Stefania ArioliDivision of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Luigi Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Valentina TavernitiDivision of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Luigi Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Walter FioreSofar S.p.A., Via Firenze 40, 20060, Trezzano Rosa (MI), Trezzano Rosa, Italy.
Elena GrossiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Gaia Maria AnelliDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Irene CetinDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Simone GuglielmettiDivision of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Luigi Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITSofar (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral consumption of probiotics is practical and can be an effective solution to preserve vaginal eubiosis. Here, we studied the ability of orally administered Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-S01 (DSM 26760) to affect the composition of the vaginal microbiota and colonize the vaginal mucosa in nondiseased adult women. A total of 40 volunteers took oral probiotic (24 billion CFU) or placebo capsules daily for 4 weeks, and after a 4-week washout, they switched to placebo or probiotic capsules according to the crossover design. A total of 23 volunteers completed the study according to the protocol. Before and after capsule ingestion, vaginal swabs were collected for qPCR quantification to detect L. paracasei LPC-S01 and for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Vaginal swabs were grouped according to their bacterial taxonomic structure into nine community state types (CSTs), four of which were dominated by lactobacilli. Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-S01 was detected in the vagina of two participants. Statistical modeling (including linear mixed-effects model analysis) demonstrated that daily intake of probiotic capsules reduced the relative abundance of Gardnerella spp. Quantitative PCR with Gardnerella vaginalis primers confirmed this result. Considering the pathogenic nature of G. vaginalis, these results suggest a potential positive effect of this probiotic capsule on the vaginal microbial ecosystem.

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus paracaseiMicrobiotaProbioticsVaginosis, BacterialAdultCapsulesCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCapsulesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene profilingcommunity state typesGardnerellaLactobacillusprobioticvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID32383767
PMCPMC7261233
OpenAlexW3022327624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.