Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383449›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2020

Few Losses to Follow-up in a Sub-Saharan African Cancer Cohort via Active Mobile Health Follow-up.

Milena Foerster, Angelica Anele, Charles Adisa, Moses Galukande, Groesbeck Parham, Annelle Zietsman, Christopher Sule Oyamienlen, Kingsley Chukwunyere Iwuoha, Esther Ezeigbo, Evelyn Bakengesa and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A model for an undergraduate research experience program in quantitative sciences.Journal of statistics and data science education : an official journal of the of the American Statistical Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Milena Foerster
Angelica Anele
Charles Adisa
Moses Galukande
Groesbeck Parham
Annelle Zietsman
Christopher Sule Oyamienlen
Kingsley Chukwunyere Iwuoha
Esther Ezeigbo
Evelyn Bakengesa
Agnes Kaggwa
Allen Naamala
Anne Nteziryayo
Teopista Nakazibwe
Leeya F Pinder
Emily Walubita
Johanna Pontac
Benjamin O Anderson
Fiona McKenzie
Joachim Schüz
Isabel Dos Santos Silva
Valerie McCormack

Funding

UNC Global Women’s Health FellowshipT32HD075731 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2013 to 2024
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD075731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate survival estimates are needed for guiding cancer control efforts in sub-Saharan Africa, but previous studies have been hampered by unknown biases due to excessive loss to follow-up (LTFU). In the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes Study, a prospective breast cancer cohort study, we implemented active mobile health follow-up, telephoning each woman or her next-of-kin (NOK) trimonthly on her mobile phone to update information on her vital status. Dates of every contact with women/NOK were analyzed from diagnosis in 2014-2017 to the earliest of September 1, 2018, death, or 3 years postdiagnosis. The cumulative incidence of being LTFU was calculated considering deaths as competing events. In all, 1,490 women were followed for a median of 24.2 (interquartile range (IQR), 14.2-34.5) months, corresponding to 8,529 successful contacts (77% of total contacts) with the women/NOK. Median time between successful contacts was 3.0 (IQR, 3.0-3.7) months. In all, 71 women (5.3%) were LTFU at 3 years: 0.8% in Nigeria, 2.2% in Namibia, and 5.6% in Uganda. Because of temporary discontinuity of active follow-up, 20.3% of women were LTFU after 2 years in Zambia. The median time to study notification of a death was 9.1 (IQR, 3.9-14.0) weeks. Although the present study was not a randomized controlled trial, in this cancer cohort with active mobile health follow-up, LTFU was much lower than in previous studies and enabled estimation of up-to-date and reliable cancer survival.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTelemedicinebreast cancercancer survivalloss to follow-upmobile healthprospective studiessub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32383449
PMCPMC8179024
OpenAlexW3022350645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.