Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383429›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2020

A systematic review of interventions to improve the dietary intake, physical activity and weight status of children attending family day care services.

Sze Lin Yoong, Melanie Lum, Jannah Jones, Erin Kerr, Maryann Falkiner, Tessa Delaney, Sam McCrabb, Li Kheng Chai, Kirsty Seward, Alice Grady

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Evidence Mapping: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practice Elements in Early Childhood Education and Care.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sze Lin YoongUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Melanie LumUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-6549
Jannah JonesUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Erin KerrEarly Start and School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
Maryann FalkinerHunter New England Local Health District, Population Health, Wallsend, NSW2287, Australia.
Tessa DelaneyUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Sam McCrabbUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Li Kheng ChaiUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Kirsty SewardUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.
Alice GradyUniversity of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-5340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo (i) identify and synthesise findings from interventions to improve the dietary intake, physical activity and weight status of children aged 0-6 years attending family day care services; and (ii) assess the impact of interventions on family day care environments, intervention cost and adverse outcomes.

designMedline in Process, PsycINFO, ERIC, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched in March 2019. Studies were included if they (i) evaluated an intervention to improve the diet, physical activity and/or weight of children aged 0-6 years; (ii) were delivered in family day care services; (iii) targeted child diet, physical activity and/or weight; and (iv) used a parallel control group design. Screening was undertaken by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.

settingFamily day care services, also known as family childcare homes.

participantsChildren aged 0-6 years attending family day care services.

resultsIn total, 8977 titles were retrieved, and 199 full-texts reviewed. No studies met the inclusion criteria for the primary outcome; however, two studies reporting on the secondary outcome of family day care environments were included. The 4-year community-wide obesity prevention programme and the 12-month train-the-trainer programme both reported statistically significant improvements in the healthy eating and physical activity environments of family day care, compared to cross-sectional state-average control groups.

conclusionsFindings highlight few existing interventions in family day care services and a need for high-quality controlled trials to identify effective interventions to improve children's diet, activity and weight in this setting.

Indexed as

Body WeightChild CareDietExerciseChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEatingHumansInfantChildrenDietary intakeFamily day careObesityPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32383429
PMCPMC10200613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.