Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383254›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2020

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies using a CPE-based colorimetric live virus micro-neutralization assay in human serum samples.

Alessandro Manenti, Marta Maggetti, Elisa Casa, Donata Martinuzzi, Alessandro Torelli, Claudia M Trombetta, Serena Marchi, Emanuele Montomoli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro ManentiVisMederi Research s.r.l., Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4027-7296
Marta MaggettiVisMederi s.r.l., Siena, Italy.
Elisa CasaVisMederi Research s.r.l., Siena, Italy.
Donata MartinuzziVisMederi Research s.r.l., Siena, Italy.
Alessandro TorelliVisMederi Research s.r.l., Siena, Italy.
Claudia M TrombettaDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Serena MarchiDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Emanuele MontomoliVisMederi Research s.r.l., Siena, Italy.
VisMederi Research · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The micro-neutralization assay is a fundamental test in virology, immunology, vaccine assessment, and epidemiology studies. Since the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak at the end of December 2019 in China, it has become extremely important to have well-established and validated diagnostic and serological assays for this new emerging virus. Here, we present a micro-neutralization assay with the use of SARS-CoV-2 wild type virus with two different methods of read-out. We evaluated the performance of this assay using human serum samples taken from an Italian seroepidemiological study being performed at the University of Siena, along with the human monoclonal antibody CR3022 and some iper-immune animal serum samples against Influenza and Adenovirus strains. The same panel of human samples have been previously tested in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a pre-screening. Positive, borderline, and negative ELISA samples were evaluated in neutralization assay using two different methods of read-out: subjective (by means of an inverted optical microscope) and objective (by means of a spectrophotometer). Our findings suggest that at least 50% of positive ELISA samples are positive in neutralization as well, and that method is able to quantify different antibody concentrations in a specific manner. Taken together, our results confirm that the colorimetric cytopathic effect-based microneutralization assay could be used as a valid clinical test method for epidemiological and vaccine studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCell Line, TumorChlorocebus aethiopsColorimetryCOVID-19Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHepatocytesHumansImmune SeraMicroscopyNeutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2SpectrophotometryAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmune Seraepidemiologyhumoral immunityneutralizationpandemicSARS coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID32383254
PMCPMC7267461
OpenAlexW3022376279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.