Observational studyHematological oncology2020
Rare lymphomas in routine practice-Treatment and outcome in Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms.
Observational study in Hematological oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00889798 (Epidemiological Registry Describing Treatment Reality and Therapy Modalities of Patients With Malignant Lymphatic Systemic Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epidemiological Registry Describing Treatment Reality and Therapy Modalities of Patients With Malignant Lymphatic Systemic Diseases (Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma) Requiring Therapy.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective, longitudinal oncology registries enabling advanced real-world evidence: the iOMEDICO experience.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Rare lymphomas in routine practice - Treatment and outcome in marginal zone lymphoma in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms.Hematological oncology · 2021Observational
- Rare lymphomas in routine practice-Treatment and outcome in Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms.Hematological oncology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoma for which only little prospective phase III evidence exists. Thus, real world data are important to provide insight into treatment and survival. We present here data on choice and outcome of systemic treatment of patients with WM treated in German routine practice. In total, 139 patients with WM who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) were included into this analysis. We analysed the most frequently used first-line and second-line treatments between 2009 and 2017 and examined best response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Bendamustine plus rituximab, with a median of six cycles, was by far the most frequently used first-line treatment (81%). Second-line treatment was more heterogenous and mainly based on bendamustine, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP), fludarabine or ibrutinib, the latter approved in 2014. Three-year PFS from start of first-line treatment was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74%-88%), 3-year OS was 87% (95% CI 80%-92%). These prospective data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non-selected patients with WM treated in German routine practice. In the lack of prospective phase III clinical trials, real world data can help bridging the gap of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.