Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383130›Full record

SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2020

Optic disc drusen: a systematic review : Up-to-date and future perspective.

Davide Allegrini, Luca Pagano, Mariantonia Ferrara, Alfredo Borgia, Tania Sorrentino, Giovanni Montesano, Martina Angi, Mario R Romano

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Distinguishing Papilledema from Pseudopapilledema in Children.Advances in ophthalmology and optometry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Davide AllegriniDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
Luca PaganoDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy. luca.pagano91@hotmail.it.
Mariantonia FerraraEye Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Gavazzeni-Castelli, 24128, Bergamo, Italy.
Alfredo BorgiaDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
Tania SorrentinoDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
Giovanni MontesanoEye Clinic, Department of Bioscience, University of Milan, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Martina AngiNational Cancer Institute IRCCS Foundation, Via Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
Humanitas Gavazzeni · ITHumanitas University · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptic disc drusen (ODD) are acellular deposits in the prelaminar optic nerve head. The most accredited theory is that they are secondary to abnormalities in axonal metabolism and degeneration, but the pathogenesis is not clear to date. CLINICAL MANIFESTATION: Although ODD are often considered a benign condition, the great majority of patients with ODD show visual field defects and are at higher risk for developing anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. ODD are classified as superficial or buried, with the latter being often misdiagnosed as papilledema with optic nerve head swelling, leading to an unnecessary investigation for causes of increased intracranial pressure.

aimThe recent technological improvements in OCT imaging which allowed an earlier and more certain diagnosis even of the smallest ODD, renovated the interest around this pathology. However, an updated systematic review is still missing. Therefore, the aim of this work is to provide a concise yet comprehensive overview of the current state of art, focusing on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and potential future perspectives of this condition.

Indexed as

Optic DiskOptic Disk DrusenOptic Neuropathy, IschemicPapilledemaHumansVisual Field TestsBuried drusenHypocalcemiaOptic disc drusenSuperficial drusen

Identifiers

PMID32383130
OpenAlexW3021481762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.