Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32383069›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2020

Remedial potential of bacterial and fungal strains (Bacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium chrysogenum) against organochlorine insecticide Endosulfan.

Khuram Shahzad Ahmad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review on Performance ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khuram Shahzad AhmadDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Old Presidency, The Mall, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan. chemist.phd33@yahoo.com.
Fatima Jinnah Women University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endosulfan, an organochlorine insecticide, is known to cause detrimental effects to the environment and human health due to its excessive usage. Its highly toxic nature calls for an environmental-friendly approach for its detoxification. Environmental transformation of Endosulfan was assessed through biodegradation by isolated and cultured soil microbes (Bacillus subtilis (BS), Aspergillus niger (AN), Aspergillus flavus (AF) and Penicillium chrysogenum (PC)). Degradation of 10 mg/L Endosulfan was determined in aqueous solution at regular time intervals and analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for 35 days. BS and AN displayed substantial potential to degrade Endosulfan and subsequently transform it into its daughter products (95 and 77%, respectively). Endosulfan transformation followed first-order reaction kinetics. Chromatogram peaks revealed less toxic metabolites by Endosulfan transformation (Endosulfan diol, Endosulfan ether, Endosulfan hydroxyether and Endosulfan lactone). Half-life of Endosulfan obtained by various strains utilised in the experiments was in the order, PC (69) > AF (34.6) > AN (17.3) > BS (11.5) days. Statistical analysis was performed in MINITAB to evaluate the significance of results. Bioaugmentation of contaminated sites with such efficient microbes can facilitate rapid pesticide transformation and decontamination of the environment.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiotransformationEndosulfanEnvironmental PollutantsFungiInsecticidesKineticsSoil MicrobiologyEndosulfanEnvironmental PollutantsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID32383069
OpenAlexW3023253835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.