Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382957›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2020

Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses.

Sabine Guth, Stephanie Hüser, Angelika Roth, Gisela Degen, Patrick Diel, Karolina Edlund, Gerhard Eisenbrand, Karl-Heinz Engel, Bernd Epe, Tilman Grune and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 19 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabine Guth *Department of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Stephanie Hüser *Department of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Angelika Roth *Department of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Gisela DegenDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Patrick DielDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Karolina EdlundDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Gerhard Eisenbrand, Kühler Grund 48/1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz EngelDepartment of General Food Technology, School of Life Sciences, TU Munich, Freising, Germany.
Bernd EpeInstitute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tilman GruneDepartment of Molecular Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany.
Volker HeinzGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL), Quakenbrück, Germany.
Thomas HenleDepartment of Food Chemistry, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich HumpfInstitute of Food Chemistry, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
Henry JägerInstitute of Food Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Hans-Georg JoostDepartment of Experimental Diabetology, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany.
Sabine E KullingDepartment of Safety and Quality of Fruit and Vegetables, Max Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Alfonso LampenDepartment of Food Safety, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Angela MallyDepartment of Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Rosemarie MarchanDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Doris MarkoDepartment of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva MühleDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Elke RöhrdanzDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany.
Richard StadlerInstitute of Food Safety and Analytic Sciences, Nestlé Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christoph van ThrielDepartment of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Stefan ViethsPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Rudi F VogelLehrstuhl für Technische Mikrobiologie, TU Munich, Freising, Germany.
Edmund WascherDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Carsten WatzlDepartment of Immunology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Ute Nöthlings *Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Nutritional Epidemiology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University Bonn, Bonn, Germany. noethlings@uni-bonn.de.
Jan G Hengstler *Department of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany. hengstler@ifado.de.
TU Dortmund University · DELeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DEGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEBOKU University · ATFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DEFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEGerman Institute of Food Technologies · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMax Rubner Institut · DENestlé (Switzerland) · CHPaul Ehrlich Institut · DETechnical University of Munich · DETU Dresden · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, epidemiological studies have suggested that fluoride is a human developmental neurotoxicant that reduces measures of intelligence in children, placing it into the same category as toxic metals (lead, methylmercury, arsenic) and polychlorinated biphenyls. If true, this assessment would be highly relevant considering the widespread fluoridation of drinking water and the worldwide use of fluoride in oral hygiene products such as toothpaste. To gain a deeper understanding of these assertions, we reviewed the levels of human exposure, as well as results from animal experiments, particularly focusing on developmental toxicity, and the molecular mechanisms by which fluoride can cause adverse effects. Moreover, in vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells were analyzed, and 23 epidemiological studies published since 2012 were considered. The results show that the margin of exposure (MoE) between no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal studies and the current adequate intake (AI) of fluoride (50 µg/kg b.w./day) in humans ranges between 50 and 210, depending on the specific animal experiment used as reference. Even for unusually high fluoride exposure levels, an MoE of at least ten was obtained. Furthermore, concentrations of fluoride in human plasma are much lower than fluoride concentrations, causing effects in cell cultures. In contrast, 21 of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence. The discrepancy between experimental and epidemiological evidence may be reconciled with deficiencies inherent in most of these epidemiological studies on a putative association between fluoride and intelligence, especially with respect to adequate consideration of potential confounding factors, e.g., socioeconomic status, residence, breast feeding, low birth weight, maternal intelligence, and exposure to other neurotoxic chemicals. In conclusion, based on the totality of currently available scientific evidence, the present review does not support the presumption that fluoride should be assessed as a human developmental neurotoxicant at the current exposure levels in Europe.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsArsenicChildDrinking WaterEnvironmental ExposureEpidemiologic StudiesEuropeFemaleFluoridesHumansMethylmercury CompoundsNeurotoxicity SyndromesNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelArsenicDrinking WaterFluoridesMethylmercury CompoundsAnimal studiesDevelopmental neurotoxicityEpidemiological studiesIn vitro dataRisk assessmentSodium fluoride

Identifiers

PMID32382957
PMCPMC7261729
OpenAlexW3021983165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.