ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020
Fungal RNA editing: who, when, and why?
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Lifecycle-Dependent A to I RNA Editing in Three Members of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The biological and evolutionary consequences of competition between DNA sequences that benefit the cell and DNA sequences that benefit themselves.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Massive RNA Editing in Ascetosporean Mitochondria.Microbes and environments · 2025Article
- Comparative mitogenomic analysis reveals variations and evolution of ectomycorrhizal fungalIMA fungus · 2025Article
- Past, Present, and Future of RNA Modifications in Infectious Disease Research.ACS infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A-to-I RNA Editing in Klebsiella pneumoniae Regulates Quorum Sensing and Affects Cell Growth and Virulence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Lactobacillus for ribosome peptide editing cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Review
- The Role of Chromatin and Transcriptional Control in the Formation of Sexual Fruiting Bodies in Fungi.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RNA editing occurs in all kingdoms of life and in various RNA species. The editing of nuclear protein-coding transcripts has long been known in metazoans, but was only recently detected in fungi. In contrast to many metazoan species, fungal editing sites occur mostly in coding regions, and therefore, fungal editing can change protein sequences and lead to modified or new functions of proteins. Indeed, mRNA editing is thought to be generally adaptive on fungi. Although RNA editing has been detected in both, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, there seem to be considerable differences between these two classes of fungi concerning the types, the timing, and the purpose of editing. This review summarizes the characteristics of RNA editing in fungi and compares them to metazoan species and bacteria. In particular, it will review cellular processes affected by editing and speculate on the purpose of editing for fungal biology with a focus on the filamentous ascomycetes. KEY POINTS: • Fungi show various types of mRNA editing in nuclear transcripts. • Fungal editing leads to proteome diversification. • Filamentous ascomycetes may require editing for sexual sporulation. • Wood-degrading basidiomycetes may use editing for adaptation to different substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.