ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Performance of river sediments after flocculation-pressure filter membrane-vacuum preloading.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formulation optimization and synergistic effects of flocculation-solidification-vacuum preloading on sludge treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The main problem in the reduction of river bottom sediments is to solve the dewatering of the sludge. The commonly used natural air drying method requires a large amount of time and economic cost. In this paper, different treatments were developed for the needs of the project, and related tests were carried out on the reduction of the sludge. Firstly, two or more flocculants were compounded according to the nature of the sludge. The 6 different treatments were determined according to the sedimentation and the turbidity value of the supernatant. Secondly, the dewatering test was carried out on river sediments after flocculation-vacuum preloading. The dewatering effect of different flocculants, water quality, dissipation of pore water pressure, vane shear strength, compression coefficient, and coefficient of consolidation have been analyzed after flocculation-vacuum preloading. The polysilicate aluminium ferric (PSAF) can greatly increase the dewatering efficiency of the filter press membrane, and the final dewatering amount could reach 310 g. The effect of purifying water quality was PSAF>PAM (polyacrylamide, PAM-1(18 million): PAM-2(23 million) = 3:7)>PAC (polyaluminium chloride). The PSAF and PAC could increase the pH of the water during the vacuum preloading test. The PAM has the best the vane shear strength. Lime could improve the vacuum preloading and the vane shear strength when it was added to other flocculants. The incorporation of PSAF could accelerate the dissipation and increase the final dissipation value of pores water pressure. Compared with PAM+PAC+lime, PAM+lime, PAM+PSAF+lime, PAM+PSAF, and PAM+PAC, the overall effect and price of the PAM is optimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.