ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes and Experience of 550 Patients in a Single Institution.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of unplanned conversion to open surgery on resection margins and complications in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic PancreaticoduodenectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stent after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Video-based characterization of intraoperative bleeding patterns and hemostasis behaviors in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparative Severe Complications After Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in PDAC vs Non-PDAC Periampullary Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis in pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective cohort study on risk factors and clinical outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Impact of overweight on patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: analysis of surgical outcomes in a high-volume center.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors of textbook outcome in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: results from a prospective high-volume center study.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Prevention of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by wrapping ligamentum teres hepatis surrounding hepatic portal artery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center experience of 827 cases.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Unplanned conversions of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: short-term outcomes and suggested stepwise approach for a safe conversion.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Wrapping pancreaticojejunostomy using the ligamentum teres hepatis during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Usage of a simplified blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center experience.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Initial experience of single-incision plus one port total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- First assistant experience in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: accelerating the learning curve for an operator.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Completely 3-dimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: an analysis of 100 consecutive cases.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Is there a survival benefit of a robotic approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most technically challenging surgical procedures, involving complicated dissection and reconstruction. Recently, enthusiasm for performing this procedure has increased; however, concerns have been raised regarding its perioperative and oncologic outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LPD between 2010 and 2019 at our institution. We analyzed perioperative and oncologic outcomes of LPD, risk factors associated with complications, and the learning curve.
results550 patients underwent LPD, including 473 standard LPD and 77 LPD with vascular resection. Of these, 38.5% experienced complications. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 24% of patients. Five patients died within 90 days. No significant differences were observed in terms of complications or 90-day mortality between patients who underwent LPD with vascular resection versus standard LPD. Patients with pancreatic cancer had the shortest median survival time (20 months); patients with duodenal or papillary cancer had the longest median survival time (50 months). Pancreatic cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and operative time were risk factors associated with complications, and previous abdominal surgery, ASA score, and body mass index were risk factors associated with severe complications. Finally, surgeons who performed standard LPD had a learning period of 47 procedures, whereas surgeons who performed LPD with vascular resection were proficient after having performed 200 standard LPD procedures.
conclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, and oncologically acceptable procedure when performed in a high-volume center. Performance of LPD should follow a step-by-step principle because of the long and steep learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.