Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382892›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes and Experience of 550 Patients in a Single Institution.

Xin Wang, Yunqiang Cai, Jingwen Jiang, Bing Peng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laparoscopic PancreaticoduodenectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin WangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Bing Peng, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yunqiang CaiDepartment of Minimal Invasive Surgery, Shangjin Nanfu Hosptial, Chengdu, China.
Jingwen JiangBiomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bing PengDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Bing Peng, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. hxwangxin2012@hotmail.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Institutes of Health of China W2017ZWS07Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province 2018KZ0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most technically challenging surgical procedures, involving complicated dissection and reconstruction. Recently, enthusiasm for performing this procedure has increased; however, concerns have been raised regarding its perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LPD between 2010 and 2019 at our institution. We analyzed perioperative and oncologic outcomes of LPD, risk factors associated with complications, and the learning curve.

results550 patients underwent LPD, including 473 standard LPD and 77 LPD with vascular resection. Of these, 38.5% experienced complications. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 24% of patients. Five patients died within 90 days. No significant differences were observed in terms of complications or 90-day mortality between patients who underwent LPD with vascular resection versus standard LPD. Patients with pancreatic cancer had the shortest median survival time (20 months); patients with duodenal or papillary cancer had the longest median survival time (50 months). Pancreatic cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and operative time were risk factors associated with complications, and previous abdominal surgery, ASA score, and body mass index were risk factors associated with severe complications. Finally, surgeons who performed standard LPD had a learning period of 47 procedures, whereas surgeons who performed LPD with vascular resection were proficient after having performed 200 standard LPD procedures.

conclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, and oncologically acceptable procedure when performed in a high-volume center. Performance of LPD should follow a step-by-step principle because of the long and steep learning curve.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32382892
OpenAlexW3021531414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.