ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021
Risk factors for complications after endoscopic treatment in Chinese patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical value of predicting bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Risk modeling of delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- The application effect of rubber band traction assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Feasibility and predictors of same-day discharge following endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions and early esophageal carcinoma: Analysis of efficacy and serum tumor markers.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Prediction of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Endoscopic Treatments for Early Esophageal Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Review
- Advances in The Application of Regenerative Medicine in Prevention of Post-endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Stenosis.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2022Article
- Risk Factors for Fever After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Its Derived Technique.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the risk factors for complications after endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions and provides evidence for developing preventive measures against these complications.
methodsThe clinical data of patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions treated in the Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College from January 2009 to December 2015 were analyzed. The risk factors related to delayed bleeding, perforation, and stenosis were assessed.
resultsOf 459 patients, 15 (3.3%) had delayed bleeding, 16 (3.5%) had perforation, and 82 (17.9%) had stenosis. Conservative treatment was performed for patients with bleeding and perforation, and endoscopic dilation was performed to relieve stenosis. The independent risk factors for delayed bleeding were lesion size (OR = 1.51, P = 0.020), circumferential diameter [odds ratio (OR) = 1.24, P = 0.037]. The kind of operation method [endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/cap-based endoscopic resection (EMR-Cap): OR = 15.38, P = 0.013) was the independent risk factor for perforation. The independent predictors of stenosis were circumferential diameter (OR = 1.58, P < 0.001), lesion in the neck (OR = 0.12, P = 0.003), and surgical time (OR = 1.02, P = 0.007).
conclusionFew complications occur after the endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions which can be treated by endoscopic and conservative medical therapies. Strict operational training is required for ESD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.