Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32382878›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmad M Tarawneh, Muralidharan Venkatesan, Dritan Pasku, Jagdeep Singh, Nasir A Quraishi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined anterior-posterior versus posterior only approach for surgical management of adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Biplanar vs. uniplanar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for rigid adult spinal deformity: trading safety for correction?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.North American Spine Society journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad M TarawnehCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. neurostarawneh@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-678X
Muralidharan VenkatesanCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Dritan PaskuCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jagdeep SinghCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Nasir A QuraishiCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

backgroundThree-column osteotomies (3-CO) have gained popularity in the last decade as part of the armamentarium for the surgical correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Three-column osteotomies in the form of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be necessary to achieve adequate correction for severe and rigid spinal deformity. Studies reporting improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with validated outcome measures after PSO surgery are sparse and currently consist of small series.

objectiveEvaluate the improvement in HRQOL measures following PSO for adult spinal deformity.

methodsTwo independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the English literature between period 1996 and 2019 for articles reporting outcome of PSO in patients with ASD according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies consisting of patient-reported outcome Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society 22 or 24 (SRS) outcomes after PSO surgery for adult spine deformity patients (18 years or older) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

resultsEight studies with 431 PSOs were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in ODI in PSO (P < 0.0001), and the mean clinically important difference was achieved with both ODI (50.46 (45.5-55.4) preoperatively to 32.78 (29.7-39) postoperatively) and SRS (2.49 (2.38-2.7) preoperatively to 3.26 (2.8-4.1) postoperatively) scores.

conclusionThis meta-analysis did find improvements in the health-related quality of life in patients undergoing PSO surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansOsteotomyRetrospective StudiesScoliosisTreatment OutcomeAdult spine deformityHealth-related quality of lifeOswestry Disability Index (ODI)Pedicle subtraction osteotomyScoliosis research society (SRS)

Identifiers

PMID32382878
OpenAlexW3022871128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.